instagram envelope_alt facebook twitter search youtube_play whatsapp remove external_link loop2 arrow-down2

Tate Modern attack teen says he hurled boy, 6, from balcony ‘to prove a point’

Video link: Jonty Bravery, 18, sat on the floor with his T-shirt over his head at one point during today's hearing PICTURES: JULIA QUENZLER/PA/AFP

AN autistic teenager could be seen laughing moments after he threw a six-year-old boy from the Tate Modern viewing platform and says he did it ‘to prove a point to “every idiot” who had ever said he did not have a mental health problem’, a court heard today.

Jonty Bravery, who was 17 at the time of his attack on August 4 last year, was even heard telling onlookers: ‘It’s not my fault, it’s social services’ fault.’

Bravery spent more than 15 minutes stalking potential victims at the London tourist attraction before fixing on a young visitor who had briefly left his parents’ side, the Old Bailey heard.

The well-built 17-year-old, from Ealing in West London, was said to have ‘scooped [the victim] up and, without any hesitation, carried him straight to the railings and threw him over’.

Second choice: Bravery headed to the Tate, pictured, after finding tickets for the Shard too expensive

The victim, who cannot be identified because of his age, fell around 100ft (30m) to a platform below, while disbelieving witnesses, including the boy’s parents, challenged Bravery, who is reported to have ‘sniggered’.

The victim’s father originally thought the incident was ‘a joke’ until he saw his son’s severely injured and bloodied body below.

The child’s mother became ‘increasingly hysterical’ and tried to climb over the railings to get to her son several storeys below, but was held back by staff, the court heard.

Bravery, who is now 18 and admits attempted murder, was said to ‘have a big smile on his face’ and told the boy’s father: ‘Yes, I am mad.’

Bravery then sought out Tate staff and confessed: ‘I think I’ve murdered someone, I’ve just thrown someone off the balcony.’

He told police he heard voices in his head telling him to kill or injure someone.

‘It’s not my fault’: Bravery blames social services

The court heard Bravery was under one-on-one supervision with Hammersmith and Fulham Social Services at the time of the attack, but was allowed to go out unaccompanied for four-hour periods.

Prosecutor Deanna Heer told Bravery’s sentencing hearing today that CCTV captured the incident, then showed the defendant backing away from the railings.

She said: ‘He can be seen to be smiling, with his arms raised. At one point, he appears to shrug and laugh.’

The court heard Bravery made his way on foot to the Tate Modern, arriving at 2.16pm, having previously scoped out the Shard — Britain’s tallest building — but found he was unable to afford a ticket.

Witnesses at the Tate said he was ‘behaving in an unusual way’ and was seen to look over the railings near where he would later throw the boy.

Two women, visiting the tourist attraction with their two sons aged 11 and eight, saw the defendant ‘smiling at the children’, the court heard.

The court was told the victim and his family — on holiday from France — arrived at the Tate Modern viewing platform at 2.32pm, having spent the day sightseeing and having a picnic by the river.

CCTV then caught Bravery turning towards the victim’s family, with the boy skipping a little way away from his parents.

Ms Heer said: ‘As [the boy] approached, the defendant scooped him up and, without any hesitation, carried him straight to the railings and threw him over.

‘The CCTV footage shows [the boy] falling head-first towards the ground.’

The court heard the boy suffered life-threatening injuries, including a bleed to the brain, spinal fractures, and broken legs and arms, and spent more than a month in hospital in the UK before being discharged to a hospital in France.

An update on a GoFundMe page that has raised more than £200,000 for the boy’s medical treatment said he remained in a wheelchair and had problems eating, speaking and moving, but was continuing to make progress.

The statement, posted on behalf of his family on May 15, stated: ‘There is still a long way to go but we are holding on.’

Ms Heer said: ‘Whether he will ever make a full recovery is not known.’

A victim impact statement from the victim’s parents, taken six months after the incident, said: ‘The act committed by this defendant against our son is unspeakable.

‘We have been so scared of losing him that now it is impossible for us to spend more than a few hours away from him.’

Cry for help? Bravery told police, pictured outside the Tate after the incident, he wanted to be ‘on the news’

Ms Heer said Bravery blamed social services when challenged by witnesses moments after the incident.

The prosecutor said Bravery ‘sniggered’. Asked why he had done it, Bravery said: ‘It’s a long story.’

He was also heard to say, ‘It’s not my fault, it’s social services’ fault’, with a shrug, the lawyer said.

Following his arrest, Bravery was said to have asked police if he was going to be ‘on the news’.

Ms Heer said: ‘He said he wanted to be on the news so that everyone, especially his parents, could see what a mistake they had made by not putting him in hospital.’

Bravery said that he had been ‘seriously unhappy’ recently and that he had to do anything he could to get out of his accommodation.

Ms Heer told the court: ‘He said he had to prove a point to “every idiot” who had ever said he did not have a mental health problem that he should not be in the community.’

He said he had been planning the incident for a long time, the court was told.

Giving evidence, Dr Joanna Dow, a consultant forensic psychiatrist who works at Broadmoor Hospital where Bravery is being held, said she believed the defendant had a mixed personality disorder and struggled to manage his emotions.

She recommended Bravery be detained in hospital, rather than handed a prison sentence, so he could get treatment such as anger management and to learn social communication and interaction skills.

A report into Bravery’s behaviour, carried out after the incident, found ‘his callousness and the striking lack of emotional empathy… is not typical of autism but is more typically found in psychopathy’.

The prosecutor, citing the report, added: ‘The defendant fully understood the consequences of his actions and was capable of exercising self-control to resist acting in the way that he did.’

Bravery appeared in court via videolink from Broadmoor.

At one stage he could be seen with his T-shirt over his head, and moved from his chair to the floor.

The hearing continues, although the judge said Bravery would be sentenced on Friday.