THE government will decide next week how to end the current lockdown as scientists warned a tougher tier system is needed until vaccines can drive back the Covid-19 pandemic.
Communities secretary Robert Jenrick (pictured) said today that ministers want to see a ‘significant easing’ of coronavirus controls when the lockdown in England is lifted on December 2, but suggested tighter controls may be needed in the top tier three.
It comes after Susan Hopkins, medical director of Public Health England (PHE) and chief medical adviser to NHS Test and Trace, said ministers would have to look at ‘strengthening’ the tier system.
Tier one restrictions that covered huge parts of England had ‘very little effect’, she said, adding that even tier two only worked in some areas.
Meanwhile, in Soctland today, first minister Nicola Sturgeon announced that 11 council areas will be placed under the toughest coronavirus rules from 6pm on Friday to tackle infection rates that were still too high.
She said placing council areas in Scotland into the toughest restrictions is intended to be ‘short and sharp’.
In a round of broadcast interviews today, Mr Jenrick said any extension of the current lockdown would require a vote of parliament.
‘It is our hope and expectation that that won’t be the case and that people in England will be able to move back into the tiered system,’ he told Sky News.
‘There will be a review. That work is undergoing on what those tiers look like and how local areas go back in, but that will very much depend on the data.
‘We will have to make decisions nearer the end of the month once we have got the most up-to-date information possible.
‘But we all want to see a significant easing of the measures in all parts of England at the beginning of next month.’
However, Mr Jenrick told BBC Breakfast the government will be looking at whether to ‘embed’ the additional measures previously available to local areas placed under tier three.
Asked if there could be a tougher tier than tier three in the new system, he said: ‘We haven’t come to a decision on that.
‘The tier three that we had before was just considered a baseline, and then we did ask local areas whether they would be willing to go further and some did.
‘My own area of Nottinghamshire, the local council chose to go over and above and limit the sale of alcohol for off-licences and so on after a certain time, so that people didn’t go home and have parties or drink alcohol on the streets.
‘So there were some tweaks to the tiers that you’re seeing in some parts of the country and it’s that sort of thing that we now need to consider.’
■ The prime minister is continuing to self-isolate after a meeting with MP Lee Anderson, who tested positive for Covid-19.
■ Low-cost carrier easyJet has reported pre-tax losses of £1.27billion for the year to September 30, marking the first loss in the airline’s 25-year history.
■ The government announced a further 213 people had died within 28 days of testing positive for Covid-19 as of Monday, bringing the UK total to 52,147.
In a Downing Street press conference yesterday, health secretary Matt Hancock said it was ‘too early for us to know’ whether coronavirus cases will be brought down sufficiently to ease the lockdown.
Asked by his shadow counterpart Jonathan Ashworth in the Commons today if the government intended to impose a tougher set of restrictions on tier one post-lockdown, Mr Hancock also said it was ‘too early’ to say.
Prime minister Boris Johnson has expressed determination to ease the current lockdown, but Dr Hopkins — standing alongside Mr Hancock at the Downing Street press conference — said new measures were needed.
She said tier three, and especially tier three with further restrictions in the north, had had an effect in reducing cases.
Of tier two, which saw a ban on meeting people from other households indoors, including in pubs and restaurants, Dr Hopkins said it seemed to hold cases down in some areas but ‘not so well in others’.
She added: ‘We see very little effect from tier one and I think when we look at what tiers may be there in the future, we will have to think about strengthening them in order to get us through the winter months until the vaccine is available for everyone.’
Meanwhile, Sir John Bell, regius professor of medicine at Oxford University and a member of the government’s vaccine taskforce, said he was hopeful large numbers of people could be vaccinated by the spring.
Data released yesterday from US firm Moderna showed its jab to be almost 95 per cent effective in protecting against Covid-19, following news that a jab from Pfizer/BioNTech is over 90 per cent effective.
Sir John Bell told Radio 4’s Today programme today: ‘We can get vaccines into people in the UK and in most western countries pretty effectively.
‘So I think the idea that we’re going to vaccinate a very large percentage of the population by spring is completely possible.
‘And I think that will make a big difference because people will be then less anxious about catching the disease because they will be vaccinated, transmissions will fall to a low level and we may not be back completely to normal but things are going to look dramatically different by the spring.’
On safety, he said ‘most of the side-effects that have occurred from vaccines are pretty apparent within the first two to three months,’ adding that he would be surprised if Covid vaccines ‘don’t substantially reduce transmissions’.
He said the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine study, which is due to report soon, should give ‘some sense’ of the effect on transmission.
He added: ‘I’ll be very surprised that these vaccines don’t substantially reduce transmissions.
‘They may not completely eliminate the ability to grow virus in your nose, so there may be still a risk of transmissions out there, at a low level, but obviously that’s something that we have to explore.’